Look For Killer Sudoku Deadly New Dimension at Amazon
29 of 31 people found the following review helpful. Well, instead of the standard partially-filled grid, the puzzler is told what the relationship is between groups of squares. You may be told that two connected boxes have a sum total of eight or you may bee told that five connected boxes have a sum total of thirty-three. But whatever you are told, each box has a relation to others. What you fill in follows the standard Sudoku rules but some of the elimination and possibilities are similar to those in Kakuro. For instance, if two boxes add up to four, then they have to be a one and a three. you just don’t know which. These regions of relationships can range from just one square to nine or more. Just remember that sometimes one of these regions will contain the same number twice or more because it spans multiple rows, columns and subgrids. Ouch. Wrapping you mind around killer sudoku can take some getting used to but I find it a wonderful puzzle that combines classic sudoku with the mathematics of Kakuro. The result is one I find highly entertaining and am happy is finally being collected in quantity instead of just a few. This volume contains a short section on how to solve the puzzls and thwn 110 puzzles in five levels (Gentle, moderate, tricky, tough, and deadly). If you are looking for a new dimension in sudoku, check it out. 23 of 25 people found the following review helpful. ON KILLER SUDOKU: I had first encountered Killer Sudoku in Will Shortz’s Favorite Sudoku variations. I liked it so much I wanted to get more. It may seem like Killer Sukoku is just some cheap knock off of the original, but I’d say it’s what the original should have been. In fact, it’ll probably make you bored of the original like it has for me. Killer Sudoku is so much more complex, and gives you a lot of oppurtunities to apply logic that don’t exist in the original. It gets to the point in the original that to make them the most difficult, the puzzle solver must resort to the chore of possibility testing to figure it out. In Killer Sudoku there’s a lot of tricks you can do involving the sum regions, and that keeps it interesting. Although regular Sudoku has numbers, it doesn’t work with numerical values (the numbers could be replaced with letters or even meaningless symbols and you’d still be able to figure it out). In Killer Sudoku the numerical values are crucial to figuring out the puzzles; most of them give you no starting numbers and only give you sum regions instead. ON THIS BOOK: One of the first things I noticed was the Sudoku borders are in BOLD BLACK and that makes them easy to see. In Will Shortz’s book with Killer Sudoku, the borders were lighter and less noticable, and I’d sometimes lose track of which 3×3 square I was in. What the first reviewer said about difficulty is mostly true. It rougly gets more difficult from puzzle 1 to 110, but I’ve found hard ones sooner than they should be and I found a lot of easy ones later than they should be. In fact, I found that the whole “Deadly” section wasn’t any harder than the previous section. I really don’t know how they came up with the goal times for these. For a few of them I finished in less than half as much of the goal time. For others I used much more than the goal time. I found puzzles 78 and 98 to be the two most difficult ones. Puzzle 78 has a number in a certain area that looks valid, but really it isn’t if you look further. Without finding it, I don’t think you can make progress. Puzzle 98 involved a sum region trick I had never needed to use before. It took me forever to think of it. I’m very certain you can’t go on without figuring it out. 8 of 8 people found the following review helpful. I didn’t find the guidelines for solving to be particularly useful. They give a quite minimal explanation of how to solve these types of puzzles and leave out explanations of some of the more important techniques for solving, such as the 45 Rule. (Steve Arons book, “The Official Book of Killer Sudoku” contains a much more comprehensive introduction.) Regarding the suggested times, I didn’t specifically time myself, but I often noticed that I took much less or much more time than what was suggested. As for difficulty, I found that sometimes a puzzle in a given section was either much harder or much easier than what was implied. The puzzles in the Deadly section were no more difficult than the ones in the Tough section. The hardest puzzles in the book are 78, 98, and 105. I eventually figured out some interesting equations and relational techniques for solving 78 and 98. (Whew, that was fun!) Puzzle 105 is the only one that I have not yet managed to solve. This brings me to a recommendation for the Solutions section. In general, I find the solutions in the backs of Sudoku books to be useless. If I finish a puzzle and it conforms to the rules then it’s correct; otherwise it’s wrong. I don’t need a solution to tell me that. The only time I look at the solution is occasionally when I’m doing a really difficult puzzle and I want to check an intermediate result to make sure I’m on the right track so I don’t end up having to erase the entire puzzle and start over. This also helps to instantly understand what type of mistake I made. Something that would be really helpful in the solutions for the really difficult puzzles would be to show a partially solved grid and an explanation of how to get to the next step. On the whole I found this book to be very enjoyable and highly recommend it for any Killer Sudoku fan. Publisher, another one please! |
Now Add Some Math
a Good Collection of Puzzles